Andrew Naylor

Beatboxing

My first exposure to beatboxing was many years ago, my earliest memory is finding the video of Beardyman doing “Kitchen Diaries”

I’ve never followed the musical genre particularly closely but this performance always stood out as my prevailing memory and I don’t think I’ve come across a video that has entertained me as much.

Until now. I have a new hero.

Thoughts on Tempo

I can be quite an impatient person. Not in the angry sense, rather I prefer to get useless interludes (such as walking somewhere) out of the way as quickly as possible - as a child I earned the nickname “Running Boy” - even now I find myself running to my car most evenings. Fortunately for my driving license I enjoy driving and tend to stay around the speed limit.

The modern technological world doesn’t help my impatience. Why would I buy a CD and wait for it to arrive when I can just buy it on iTunes? In fact, why wait for iTunes to download it when I can, more-often-than-not, just search on Spotify and listen immediately.

I began playing the Piano at the age of 7, having weekly lessons with Mrs. Baker. I learnt the theory aspects very quickly but actually playing pieces was more of a challenge. I used to hate practising. I was frustrated that I couldn’t just bypass all the uninteresting pieces and start playing cool stuff. Eventually - to the dismay of an older self - I quit. I kept the piano though and it went unplayed for years. In fact, it wasn’t until it was put in storage while living in rented acommodation a few years ago that I started to miss it.

I started disappearing into the garage to play. I didn’t know any pieces aside from a few short riffs lurking in my muscle memory, I just wanted to play something. Anything. I started finding sheet music I wanted to play, determined that I would struggle through it. When I moved house again I made sure the piano stayed close by. I began to learn some fairly technical pieces. Nothing particularly advanced, and nothing particularly well, but the key thing was that I enjoyed them.

But my impatience was interfering. It didn’t matter which piece I was trying to learn, I would play things at a certain tempo, if not as fast as possible, and with speed comes volume. Some of the pieces I learnt warranted a certain vibrancy. Others however sounded wrong, I genuinely struggled to slow them down and play them more softly. Around two years ago I decided I would learn Moonlight Sonata. I often played in bursts, practising for perhaps an hour one day and not returning to it for weeks. I eventually started making progress to the point where I can now play it all the way through. But I still play too fast.

When I was younger and started riding a bike I would cycle everywhere flat-out. I always remember my Dad said I should see how slow I can go - that’s where the real talent lies. This seemed crazy until I tried it. Cycling fast smooths out the process, good balance is much less important. Cycle slowly however and fine, precise balance becomes critical, every movement matters.

I realised this evening how this translates to playing the piano. When playing Moonlight Sonata I have been playing at a fairly fixed tempo, to a learned rhythm. When wanting to stress myself I have played it as fast as I possibly can, with gusto, in some misguided effort to get better. This was completely wrong. I sat down this evening and played it much slower, slower than Beethoven intended. It was so hard. In places where I was trying to play exclusively from memory I got things completely wrong. I played all the way through but I felt like I hardly knew it.

In some desperate effort to reassure myself I started from the beginning and played it at my tempo. I played it even faster, I noticed how many mistakes I was making, but it didn’t matter. At this speed I could carry on without losing my flow because I wasn’t really enjoying the music, I was already thinking about the next slew of notes. By learning it to a rhythm I had masked from my brain the notes I was actually playing, my fingers just played them. You might call it muscle memory. But slowing things down disrupted my rhythm. I discovered places where I need to practise more, where my fingers know the movements but my brain doesn’t know the notes.

The thing is, there is a speed limit to how fast I can play piano. Concert pianists can play much faster but they’re still limited by the electrical impulses in their muscles, the rise and fall of the hammers. But there’s no real limit to how slow you can play, provided you play with the minimal force required to strike the strings. Who says you need to finish the piece before you die? Or even before the heat death of the universe.

I took pause for a moment, then I took it from the top. I played it as slowly as I had attempted previously, focussing on how it sounded, the keys I was playing. I think it was the most beautiful piece of music I have ever played. I could absorb the timbre of each and every note, it was marvellous.

Music stirs emotion. My music choices drive my emotions and vice versa. Playing Moonlight Sonata this evening was the first time music has moved me to tears. There’s an underlying beauty that was lost in my ambition to play it as fast as possible, to get it over with, as if getting through the piece and getting on with something else was some kind of achievement to be proud of.

I began to wonder how many opportunities have passed me by to appreciate things around me. I can think of at least one instance recently where my need to explain things quickly to move onto the next thing meant that I didn’t relax and couldn’t fully appreciate the good company I was in. There is usually more than enough time, there’s no need to be in such a hurry, even if my mind is racing. Especially when my mind is racing. It’s all too easy to miss some opportunities, the little things. The things which matter. Life isn’t an elevator pitch, it doesn’t need everything explained in 90 seconds.

When you take a slower approach to something you tend to notice the details. Things which would get otherwise lost in the furore because they appear and disappear too quickly to worry about.

Sometimes slowing things down is harder than speeding up. It’s in these cases that it’s likely worth the effort, to savour the moment, to relax and appreciate it fully. We should remember to enjoy the journey, because ultimately, what is there at the end?

Google Glass

Today Google announced their augmented reality project Google Glass. Essentially a wearable Heads-display, which, according to their concept video will provide a seamless interface for Google services to improve your day-to-day life.

There were rumblings of such a project back in February, supposedly coming out of “Google[x]”, their far-future looking lab and it seems that everything mentioned then has been confirmed, though estimates of late 2012 availability are apparently ambitious.

I think the idea is neat and I look forward to seeing what they manage to produce. However, as many people have pointed out, concept videos rarely depict reality and the concept video really does seem too good to be true. Even setting aside the systems’ interpretation of the protagonists’ “Hrmm” and grunts as commands, many of the context driven actions such as informing him the subway was suspended and re-routing to the book store seem ambitious. Then again, I’m cynical and always seem to underestimate technological capability, so I expect to be at least a little surprised.

On the other hand I am apprehensive to say that I would want to buy one. As far as Google’s services go, I am finding myself increasingly questioning their practices. I saw a brilliant quote on twitter earlier:

Why would the largest advertising company in the world want to place a screen between my eyeballs and reality?

Assuming Apple were to release something similar I’m sure all the same walled garden arguments will apply that people use to compare iOS and Android. People, read: nerds, will want their AR displays to be open so they can hack on them. When Steve first unveiled the iPhone SDK, he said that they were being very restrictive on what was possible with the SDK because the phone needs to be reliable. People don’t want malicious, or badly written software to crash their phone.

I think a wearable HUD takes this to a different level. It’s not a life-dependent system, granted, but if I’m walking along and suddenly get bombarded by some form of audio/visual distraction directly in my field of view as I’m crossing a street that could put my life in danger. Perhaps this is a hyperbolic example, but on a device which, as I gather, is intended to be active the majority of the time - as opposed to a phone which will spend the majority of the time in a pocket - such possibilities are more likely to present themselves.

I’m excited about the technological potential, particularly how they are able to project an in-focus image onto the users retina. I have some ideas how they might to do this but I’ll be interested to see what they’ve done. I’m looking forward to trying the system out, one of my colleagues has already expressed interest in getting one to experiment with in the lab at work.

However if I were to buy one for my own use I’d rather pay appropriately for the experience from a company like Apple or Microsoft than have it funded by advertising. Plus, do I really want to look like something out of Minority Report? Perhaps. I’ll just have to wait and see.

Home Computing

I mentioned in a previous post about the launch of the new iPad that I had decided my money was safe. At university I became very strict with myself to leave my laptop on my desk, connected to external KVM and as such I used the iPad extensively elsewhere. When I graduated last year, I moved back to my parents house so I could save more effectively for a house deposit. As a result of this I found myself using my laptop as a portable machine again my iPad fell by the wayside.

In the week prior to the iPad announcement - shortly after I wrote the Resolutionary post, I had left mine in the living room and my dad picked it up and started using it. Before long he was looking at second hand prices on eBay, it was clear he enjoyed using it much more than his personal laptop.

When my friend, Mark, informed me that he would attempt to purchased an iPad after work on launch day I decided I would go along for the ride. I was curious to see what the display was like and I got the impression he might need a little encouragement to part with his £500. It was exactly what I was expecting, certainly a very impressive screen, but I was a little underwhelmed as I couldn’t really appreciate the improvements prodding a display model in a busy store. I still didn’t feel I could justify the cost to myself as I already had a perfectly good iPad.

Mark decided he was going to take the plunge, so we approached one of the store staff to ask the all important question - did they have the right model in stock? After all, online orders were showing a 2-3 week lead time across the board. Surprisingly they had plenty, we were promptly escorted out of the store, into the queue system which is always present for launches at our local store. Whilst there was no one in the queue, that was where the staff were standing with stacks of cards, each one representing a unit of stock. I asked about the abundance of stock, while they wouldn’t comment on how many they received, they did point out that what they had would have to last the weekend and they were expecting to be busy.

We were allocated a card representing a 32GB black WiFi only iPad, then taken back into the store to complete the transaction. It was clear that while the store was very busy there weren’t many customers as Mark paid almost immediately. I was very impressed overall, they seem to be getting on top of their launch supply. I can’t see myself queueing overnight for a launch again.

That evening I read lots of feedback on twitter from people getting their new toys and one thing jumped out at me. Someone mentioned that the screen brightness on new iPads could be set much dimmer than previous models and this got me thinking. I have a Kindle which I read on, primarily because I don’t enjoy having my retinas scorched by the iPad screen at night. Having the option of reading on the iPad at night was very appealing though as it is much more versatile.

The following day I visited Mark and spent roughly 2-3 minutes with his iPad, primarily checking exactly how dim the screen could go. I moved some money around, called the Apple Store to check their stock levels and an hour later I was in possession of a Black, 32GB Wifi+4G iPad along with a dark grey Smart Cover.

The Smart Cover, despite its flaws lives up to my expectations and provides a happy medium between bulky case and a naked, easily damaged iPad. I’m ashamed to admit my previous iPad sustained more damage than I would have liked. My dad bought my old iPad off me for the price of my cars Vehicle Excise Duty, which was handy because I’d spent all my money on an iPad.

I find myself using the iPad for much more than I did previously. I happen to be writing this on my Mac because I was working on some code when I decided to write but am I happy overall? Absolutely.

Resolutionary

The new iPad has been announced and it looks pretty nice.

The thing I’m most pleased about is the name. Pundits reached fever pitch this week over what it was going to be called. With the media coverage of the “disappointing” iPhone 4S, complaining that it wasn’t the “iPhone 5” that everyone was expecting, I’m glad Apple seem to have abandoned the idea of incremental naming of their products.

I think Apple, having realised they were on a slippery slope, are beginning to remedy their mistake. Every other product (except the iPhone) has survived with a simple name; iPod Touch, MacBook Air. Each product has an identifer such as “4th Generation” or “Late 2009” but they aren’t used in marketing and that is the key. People don’t want an “iPad 2S 64GB Wifi+4G”. They want an iPad. Everything else is secondary.

Tim Cook is clearly honoring one of Steve Jobs’s final wishes: “Fuck with the pundits’ ability to guess what our new devices will be called”

If I were in their position that would probably be my philosophy. They’re still going to sell them faster than they can build them. Regardless of its name.

Nevertheless, my money is safe for now. I don’t feel compelled to upgrade and I don’t think I use my current iPad enough anyway. I shall instead save my money to upgrade to the new iPhone. Or I could just go back to saving for a house as I should be doing.